---
title: SCOTUS Scramble | Trendlines by Gradient
description: Regardless of what they read, Americans’ perceptions of Justice Amy Coney Barret did not budge.
image: https://i1.createsend1.com/ei/t/AA/73A/686/csimport/scotus_plot.112857.png
---

![](https://i1.createsend1.com/ei/t/AA/73A/686/csimport/scotus_plot.112857.png)

[Kyle Block](https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines/author/kyle-block)2020/12/031 min read

# SCOTUS Scramble

[Previous ](https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines/a-partridge-and-a-fake-tree)

<https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines>

[Next ](https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines/trendlines-superlatives)

It seems that all three branches of government were on the ballot this year. With the passing of Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg just weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the other two branches of government scrambled to fill her vacant seat with Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

 

As history has been known to repeat herself, an eerily similar event occurred four years ago when Associate Justice Antonin Scalia passed away 10 months before the 2016 election. Yet, at that time there was no attempt to even try to replace him by the Republican-controlled Senate until *after* the election. 🤔

 

Given how important precedent is in the legal world, we crafted an experiment where half of the sample read a contrast between the 2016 and 2020 SCOTUS confirmations, while the other half were only reminded of the 2020 confirmation proceedings.

 

**Regardless of what they read, Americans’ perceptions of Justice Amy Coney Barret did not budge**. Her supporters and detractors are equally loyal to their side.

 

![](https://i1.createsend1.com/ei/t/AA/73A/686/csimport/scotus_plot.112857.png)

 

It was a double-edged sword for the GOP. While they got a commanding majority of the highest court in the land, their favorability dropped 5%. Was the risk worth the reward? Tune in to January's Georgia run-offs to find out.

![avatar](https://www.gradientmetrics.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Landing%20Page/team_photos/gradient-kyle.png?width=290&name=gradient-kyle.png)

[Kyle Block

](https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines/author/kyle-block)Kyle is a global market researcher who studies behavior using a wide range of methodologies. He has designed hundreds of population and consumer studies in more than three dozen international markets, and his work has influenced global ad campaigns in emerging markets. An aficionado of maps and spatial data, Kyle holds a master’s in Spatial Analytics from the University of Pennsylvania and studied International Relations and Spanish at Claremont McKenna College.

[mailto:kyle@gradientmetrics.com](mailto:kyle@gradientmetrics.com)<https://www.linkedin.com/in/kyle-block-55953355/>

## RELATED ARTICLES

<https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines/scotus-scramble#>

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "Organization",
  "address" : {
    "@type" : "PostalAddress",
    "addressCountry" : "",
    "addressLocality" : "Brooklyn",
    "addressRegion" : "New York",
    "postalCode" : "NY 11249",
    "streetAddress" : "325 Kent Avenue"
  },
  "email" : "hello@power.com",
  "knowsLanguage" : "en",
  "logo" : {
    "@type" : "ImageObject",
    "url" : "https://www.gradientmetrics.com/hubfs/branding/default/gradient_default_black.png"
  },
  "name" : "Gradient Metrics",
  "telephone" : "+49 (0) 89 123 456",
  "url" : "https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines/scotus-scramble"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "abstract" : "Regardless of what they read, Americans’ perceptions of Justice Amy Coney Barret did not budge.",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Kyle Block"
  },
  "dateModified" : "July 20, 2022 6 PM",
  "datePublished" : "December 3, 2020 10 AM",
  "headline" : "SCOTUS Scramble",
  "image" : "https://i1.createsend1.com/ei/t/AA/73A/686/csimport/scotus_plot.112857.png",
  "inLanguage" : "en",
  "keywords" : "[politics]",
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "name" : "SCOTUS Scramble",
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://www.gradientmetrics.com/hubfs/branding/default/gradient_default_black.png"
    },
    "name" : "Gradient Metrics"
  },
  "text" : "It seems that all three branches of government were on the ballot this year. With the passing of Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg just weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the other two branches of government scrambled to fill her vacant seat with Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. As history has been known to repeat herself, an eerily similar event occurred four years ago when Associate Justice Antonin Scalia passed away 10 months before the 2016 election. Yet, at that time there was no attempt to even try to replace him by the Republican-controlled Senate until after the election. 🤔 Given how important precedent is in the legal world, we crafted an experiment where half of the sample read a contrast between the 2016 and 2020 SCOTUS confirmations, while the other half were only reminded of the 2020 confirmation proceedings. Regardless of what they read, Americans’ perceptions of Justice Amy Coney Barret did not budge. Her supporters and detractors are equally loyal to their side. It was a double-edged sword for the GOP. While they got a commanding majority of the highest court in the land, their favorability dropped 5%. Was the risk worth the reward? Tune in to January's Georgia run-offs to find out.",
  "url" : "https://www.gradientmetrics.com/trendlines/scotus-scramble",
  "wordCount" : "314"
}
```