
The Social Pressures Index
Project Overview
Think tank Populace's groundbreaking initiative, in partnership with Gradient, was designed to uncover the hidden truths of public discourse by quantifying the pervasive impact of social pressures on Americans' private opinions. It was driven by a set of clear objectives:



- Most Americans are feeling social pressure
- (Un)fair society
- Distrust in American institutions
A significant majority of Americans (61%) admit to self-silencing their true beliefs due to fear of offending others. This self-silencing is strongly correlated with lower social trust, as those who self-silence are far less likely to privately agree that most people can be trusted (30%) compared to those who do not self-silence (52%). This demonstrates a widespread societal pressure that directly impacts open discourse and trust among individuals.
Even though a sizable minority of Americans (37%) publicly express a belief that we live in a mostly fair society, only 7% privately agree — a 30-point difference between public and private opinion. The difference is largest among Americans living in high income households (46% public vs. 6% private) and Republicans (50% public vs. 11% private).
Public opinion results suggest low public confidence in the Supreme Court (36%) and a general distrust of the government (22%) and media (24%). Private opinion reveals that trust is even lower than public opinion results would suggest (21% confidence in the Supreme Court, 4% trust in government, and 7% trust in media).
Research Approach

The Social Pressure Index instrument was fielded from May 16, 2024 to June 24, 2024. The survey is based on 19,879 interviews conducted by YouGov on the internet, comprising a base sample of US adults (N = 7,144). Additionally, low-incidence groups were over sampled to improve the precision of private opinion estimates. In addition to the base sample of 7,144, the Social Pressure Index survey was administered to oversamples of Asian respondents (N = 4,620), Black respondents (N = 3,934), and Hispanic respondents (N = 4,181).

The Social Pressure Index elicited Americans’ private opinions using a list experiment for a series of sensitive political, social, and cultural issues salient among the American population today. List experiments (also called the itemcount technique) are a form of indirect questioning developed to minimize social desirability and nonresponse bias by concealing respondents’ answers to sensitive items. Privacy is maintained by aggregating responses to sensitive items with other items.
As a results of our reach, Populace identified 10 key findings
- Most Americans are feeling social pressure.
A majority of Americans (58%) believe most people cannot share their honest opinions about sensitive topics in society today. And they are not wrong: Not only do 61% of Americans admit to self-silencing, private opinion methods reveal that every single demographic group is misrepresenting their true opinions on multiple sensitive issues. - College graduates and political independents are the least comfortable sharing their private views in public.
Across demographic groups, college graduates and political independents self-silence the most often, with double-digit gaps between public and private opinion on 37 of 64 issues. - (Un)fair society.
Even though a sizable minority of Americans (37%) publicly express a belief that we live in a mostly fair society, only 7% privately agree — a 30-point difference between public and private opinion. The difference is largest among Americans living in high income households (46% public vs. 6% private) and Republicans (50% public vs. 11% private). - People privately agree on most issues.
For two-thirds of the sensitive issues studied (43 of 64), ranging from abortion rights and school choice to legal immigration and voter ID requirements, 90% of demographic groups are privately on the same side of the issues. - Men and women have similar views.
A majority of men and women are on the same side of 57 of the 64 sensitive issues in this study.
- Gen Z is surprisingly mainstream.
Gen Z is notably similar to the rest of America when it comes to their private views on sensitive topics: A majority of Gen Z are on the same side as the general public on 57 out of the 64 sensitive issues in this study (differing only in the magnitude of their support or opposition to a given issue). The issues where they diverge from the rest of the general public are climate change and immigration. - There is private distrust of America’s institutions.
Public opinion results suggest low public confidence in the Supreme Court (36%) and a general distrust of the government (22%) and media (24%). Private opinion reveals that trust is even lower than public opinion results would suggest (21% confidence in the Supreme Court, 4% trust in government, and 7% trust in media). - Americans value diversity.
In private, nearly two-thirds of Americans agree more diversity would be good for the country, 64% believe legal immigrants do more to help the country than hurt it, and 58% continue to support the Black Lives Matter movement. - But Americans want meritocracy.
The vast majority of Americans, including a majority of almost every demographic group, privately believe that decisions about college admissions, as well as hiring and promotion at work, should be based on the individual’s qualifications and performance rather than other social considerations. - Americans who self-silence have less trust in other people.
People who self-silence have a social trust score that is 22-points lower than people who do not (30% and 52%, respectively).

Do you have similar existential questions and need a novel approach to answer it?
Get in touch with us and let’s see if we can partner with you to answer those questions